<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Documentary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fulldocumentaries.com/2009/05/20/google-documentary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fulldocumentaries.com/2009/05/20/google-documentary/</link>
	<description>Watch Free Documentaries Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:07:21 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JackFrost</title>
		<link>http://fulldocumentaries.com/2009/05/20/google-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator>JackFrost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fulldocumentaries.com/?p=852#comment-1611</guid>
		<description>The title is not misleading, it is about Google and what they are doing. I was hoping this documentary would go into censorship and the whole big brother thing because it is an extremely relevant subject. Google has access to so much information about us all that it&#039;s barely comprehendable. I am glad to know some of the guys at Google seem like fairly decent people. How can you morons suggest that they should have asked the people who&#039;s job it was to answer those types of questions? That totally defeats the point if you couldn&#039;t figure it out. Google needs to be put under the spot light (or pushed into a corner as Sebbe would put it) every now and then, it would be naive to treat them as harmless little nerds. Google is a monumental empire. The documentary did a good job at showing both sides of the argument, the part where Vint talks about manipulating the interview just goes to show the makers of this documentary where trying to give us as much insight into how these people think as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title is not misleading, it is about Google and what they are doing. I was hoping this documentary would go into censorship and the whole big brother thing because it is an extremely relevant subject. Google has access to so much information about us all that it&#8217;s barely comprehendable. I am glad to know some of the guys at Google seem like fairly decent people. How can you morons suggest that they should have asked the people who&#8217;s job it was to answer those types of questions? That totally defeats the point if you couldn&#8217;t figure it out. Google needs to be put under the spot light (or pushed into a corner as Sebbe would put it) every now and then, it would be naive to treat them as harmless little nerds. Google is a monumental empire. The documentary did a good job at showing both sides of the argument, the part where Vint talks about manipulating the interview just goes to show the makers of this documentary where trying to give us as much insight into how these people think as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebbe</title>
		<link>http://fulldocumentaries.com/2009/05/20/google-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fulldocumentaries.com/?p=852#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>Meck:

I totally agree! 
It seems as if this documentary is not about Google as a company developing technology for the internet, and making information accessible to the world, but rather a documentary on the dangers this applies. I think Google is doing good stuff out there, and implying that they have bad intensions with this is just a too big assumption from the documentary makers. Ask the right questions to the right people, and don&#039;t TRY to push them up in corners! Badly done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meck:</p>
<p>I totally agree!<br />
It seems as if this documentary is not about Google as a company developing technology for the internet, and making information accessible to the world, but rather a documentary on the dangers this applies. I think Google is doing good stuff out there, and implying that they have bad intensions with this is just a too big assumption from the documentary makers. Ask the right questions to the right people, and don&#8217;t TRY to push them up in corners! Badly done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meck</title>
		<link>http://fulldocumentaries.com/2009/05/20/google-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-1294</link>
		<dc:creator>Meck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 07:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fulldocumentaries.com/?p=852#comment-1294</guid>
		<description>Wow....title is very misleading, this isnt about google, its about censorship and how google is evil. I mean, why does the music get scary in the lat 10min, I mean is the future with google really that bleak? And why is that 15 year old punk that know nothing about the internet, other then he can use it to read 1984 over again, on longer then the people that actually work at google? I mean their interviews of engineers describing how exited about what they have accomplished turns into questions about &quot;Isnt google dangerous&quot;?!? Ummm, how do you expect the code writer to answer that, why dont you ask the people at google whos job it is to deal with these questions?

I must say Vint Cerf nailed it on the head when he tells the interviewer that he is using the interview to manipulate the truth to suit his bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;.title is very misleading, this isnt about google, its about censorship and how google is evil. I mean, why does the music get scary in the lat 10min, I mean is the future with google really that bleak? And why is that 15 year old punk that know nothing about the internet, other then he can use it to read 1984 over again, on longer then the people that actually work at google? I mean their interviews of engineers describing how exited about what they have accomplished turns into questions about &#8220;Isnt google dangerous&#8221;?!? Ummm, how do you expect the code writer to answer that, why dont you ask the people at google whos job it is to deal with these questions?</p>
<p>I must say Vint Cerf nailed it on the head when he tells the interviewer that he is using the interview to manipulate the truth to suit his bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

